A few days ago we shared an article reporting that the popular independent singer Mafumafu had sued “an ex-partner” to whom he was married for defamation and domestic violence, and that his lawsuit was pending in court. Although the artist did not mention any specific names, fans immediately theorized that he was talking about Uruha Rushiaa retired VTuber Hololive Production who currently works as an independent under the name “Mikeneko” (although others claim that it is also “Amemiya Nazuna” by VShojo).
Among many things you can read in this article (Vtuber Uruha Rushia committed NTR in real life), Mafumafu accused his ex-partner of being terrifyingly controlling, jealous all the time and forcing him to “report” on Discord all dayas well as a problematic person who did not even agree to live with him, keeping the apartment that Mafumafu had gotten for both of them and returning it to him in a mess after the divorce.
In his long statement, Mafumafu explained that Uruha Rushia/Mikeneko had even left the urn with his (hers) cat’s ashes in the trash, denoting a severe emotional problem.. However, it seems that the final straw was that VTuber was even unfaithful to himand that Mafumafu discovered this thanks to being contacted by the other guy, with whom he is now friends (since both were deceived by Uruha Rushia).
The days passed and now Mikeneko (formerly Uruha Rushia) has released a statement stating that “many things” mentioned in Mafumafu’s statement are lies. If you were waiting for “the other version of the story”, it is finally time for you to meet it. Thus, on her personal blog, the woman behind Uruha Rushia/Mikeneko wrote:
- I apologize for the personal inconvenience caused by this matter. I would also like to apologize again for having to inform you all this way. As previously reported, I married Mafumafu in 2021 and we divorced in 2022. Due to the various constraints that come with being a VTuber, I have had to hide this fact from you. I am truly sorry to everyone who has supported me.
- I also thought that the matter of the divorce and the lawsuit was a personal matter between him and me, and that I should not reveal to the public what had happened between us, considering their privacy and so on. Without However, he has made so many one-sided arguments public that I feel obliged to mention them. The details will be revealed in the lawsuit, etc., but I have decided to publish this text in the hope that I can tell you at least what you should know.
- About infidelity: I didn’t have a secret relationship with “B-san” during my marriage to Mafumafu. I met “B-san” once before I married Mafumafu, but we never had a supposed date and I have never seen him since. Of course, I have never had a sexual relationship with “B-san”. If you check with him, you’ll know, and I think he knows. I’ve received feedback that the screenshots are now public and that the content of the screenshots should give rise to suspicion of hoax, and I’m sorry. However, the messages were only sent hotly or jokingly and, as already mentioned, I have not seen “B-san” even once since my marriage..
- About married life: It is true that during the marriage I suspected that Mafumafu was cheating on me and I questioned him. I am sorry that this has alienated you, but I do not have the impression that I have morally harassed you or that I have relentlessly repressed you. I also have the impression that the divorce process has been resolved. The attorney who was handling the divorce discussions at the time will also provide information and cooperation to the attorney who is currently handling the case with him, including the timeline and events in the upcoming trial.
- I also had reasonable grounds to suspect that he was cheating on me, although I won’t go into details since the case is still in litigation. I didn’t hire a detective, so I don’t have objective evidence, so I can’t say for sure. But I also don’t suspect him in the dark for no reason. In this situation, he also suspected that I was cheating on him, and I think we were in a situation where neither of us could fully trust the other. He talks as if I were the only one holding him back, but he also forbade me from contacting other men, and we had agreed that I would tell him beforehand if I did.
- About the divorce agreement: In his statement, he made a statement that I had initially claimed money in the divorce, but that the financial claims had ceased after my relationship with “B-san” came to light, which is not true. First of all, my financial claims against him were based on moral harassment and a divorce offer that was too one-sided. I will refrain from writing about this point in detail here due to the possibility of defamation and other issues that may arise. I did not mention the affair, as my lawyer advised me to refrain from making accusations, as there was no objective evidence and it was only an accusation. When I talked to my family about him, they got angry and published my correspondence with them, which could have violated their rights, so, after consulting with my lawyer, we decided to get divorced, without any money being exchanged between us..
- About the slander against him: It is true that I have made several posts about him. It is also true that he has filed a lawsuit in this regard. I’m so sorry. At that time, my contract with the agency ended and he divorced me at that time, and I was emotionally trapped for some time afterwards, and after the divorce, I posted my thoughts on the Internet. Very sorry. However, my lawyer has told me that he doesn’t mention much about the lawsuit, so I won’t go into details, but many of those posts wouldn’t even qualify as illegal in my lawyer’s opinion.
- I also admitted that I had made the posts myself and, through him and my attorney, I apologized and negotiated a settlement. However, he posed a series of conditions to me, including (i) to suspend all activities under my streamer name, (ii) to not use social networks, (iii) to issue a statement with the content he requested, and (iv) to pay him one million yen in compensation. compensation. At that time, my contract with the agency had ended and I was worried about my livelihood, so I could not accept their proposal and, unable to reach an agreement, I decided to sue them.
- The lawsuit was rife with his one-sided and false statements about my familiarity with him, which were not directly related to the position in question, and his one-sided and false statements, which were often harsh, and my lawyer told me that was going too far. . I was of the opinion that “this amounts to a personal attack that unnecessarily humiliates me through litigation,” so I filed a counterclaim against him and a police report, which was accepted..
- About my pets: In your statement, you made a statement that I had been feeding my cat cloudy, dirty water, which is not true. I took good care of my cats. The photographs he claims to have taken are supposedly of the water after I had left the house. As any pet owner will know, if you give water and the cat drinks that water and a little time passes, the water becomes cloudy with saliva and hair from the cat’s body. The water was changed frequently. Also, they can’t possibly give an explanation that doesn’t make sense, like if the water wasn’t cloudy, the cat wouldn’t drink it.
- There is also a misunderstanding about the pet’s remains abandoned with the trash. First of all, the remains (ashes) of the pet are the remains of a hamster, not a cat. I had taken great care of him and, when he died, I asked a funeral service to cremate him and preserve his remains as such. However, in the rush of moving after my divorce, I left the remains at his house. Therefore, I asked my lawyer to tell him to return the remains to me, but to date they have not been returned to me.
- In closing: I am currently pursuing both civil and criminal actions against him. Furthermore, his statement and statement this time were so one-sided that, after consulting with an attorney, I have decided to take both civil and criminal action against him, even though I really did not want to do so. I didn’t want to get into this kind of dispute with the person I had once committed my life to. I am fully aware that I am guilty of the posts I made against him. However, it is really hurtful that I am told in the lawsuit that there are factual allegations that are not directly related to the post in question, and that he ignores all of my counterarguments and arguments in the lawsuit.
- I am very sorry that I, who am in a position to make you smile as a viewer, have bothered you with such an unpleasant private matter. Please note that this is a private matter. I do not wish to be defamed against you in connection with this matter, so please refrain from such behavior. Furthermore, in light of the current turmoil, there have been many defamatory posts against me that have gone too far. I will continue to take legal action against these types of publications.
So now that you have both versions, whose side do you take? Obviously this also involves a fight between the Mafumafu fans and the Uruha Rushia fans, however, The fact that it was Mafumafu who broke the silence first has a lot of influencesince now Uruha Rushia has the task of convincing everyone that many things against him “are not true.”
Fountain: Yaraon!
